Why We Punish: Lessons in Indeterminacy

Gabriel S. Mendlow, The Elusive Object of Punishment, (forthcoming), available at SSRN. SpearIt In the adjudication of criminal law, judges tend to agree upon the elements that make up a given crime, but are less certain about exactly which element the law seeks to punish. For example, in child pornography possession statutes, it is difficult to determine the underlying transgression that is targeted by the punishment. Is it the act of possessing the images that is blameworthy or is there something else? And if so, what? Does the law actually seek to punish certain thoughts that the images engender – particularly to steer people away from thinking about children in a certain way? The closer one looks, the more one might suspect that the law is punishing thoughts about certain images. From this perspective, the crime of possession takes the shape of a thought crime more than anything else. However, this very state of mind—which might be the true object of…

Read more detail on Recent Corporate Law Department posts –

This entry was posted in Corporate Law and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply