Tag Archives: To&quot

claim that bulb lasts "up to" 25 times longer isn't puffery

Young v. Cree, Inc., 2018 WL 3659305, No. 17-cv-06252-YGR (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2018)Young alleged that Cree engaged in an “unfair and deceptive practice of … promising consumers” that Cree’s light-emitting-diode bulbs “will last for particularly long periods of time … Continue reading

Posted in Advertising Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Prez Trump says he thinks "we’ll be able to" get the FIRST STEP Act passed into law

Read more detail on Recent Law Professor posts –

Posted in Law Professors | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Case o' The Week: Big To Do, "Related To" – Reinhart and Categorical Analysis of Child Porn Priors

  Ninth delivers a “narrow” defense win.United States v. Reinhart, 2018 WL 3016942 (9thCir. June 18, 2018), decision available here.The Hon. Judge Mary MurguiaPlayers: Decision by Judge Murguia, joined by Judge Gould and D. Wyoming Chief District Judge Freudenthal.  Big … Continue reading

Posted in Judiciary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

"Acceptable To" Or "Accepted By"? They Don't Mean The Same Thing To The FAA

The terms �acceptable to� and �accepted by�, although they sound similar, do not mean the same thing. Each has a very specific meaning from the FAA's perspective. If we look to the guidance the FAA issues to its inspectors, FAA … Continue reading

Posted in Aviation Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment