Categories
- Administrative law (3,493)
- Admiralty-Maritime Law (2,514)
- Advertising Law (2,069)
- Antitrust – Competition law (735)
- Aviation Law (959)
- Banking and Finance law (1,951)
- Bankruptcy Law (1,397)
- Business law (2,076)
- Constitutional Law (688)
- Contract Law (44)
- Copyright Law (1,415)
- Corporate Law (1,455)
- Criminal Law (1,149)
- Divorce Law (2,187)
- Elder Law (117)
- Employment and Labour Law (1,216)
- Environmental Law (653)
- Estate Planning (691)
- Family Law (1,070)
- General Legal News (225)
- Health Law (1,261)
- Immigration law (883)
- Injury & Accident Law (1,390)
- Insurance (664)
- Intellectual Property (1,357)
- International Law (569)
- Judiciary (562)
- Law Librarians (1,800)
- Law Professors (1,118)
- Law Students (993)
- Legal Ethics (306)
- Legal Marketing (1,086)
- Legal Theory (707)
- Medical malpractice law (1,204)
- Products Liability (847)
- Real Estate & Property Law (938)
- Securities Law (732)
- Seogpst (2)
- Tax Law (1,059)
- Technology & Cyberlaw (1,526)
- World (729)
- Germany (3)
- Writings and Citations (4)
Tag Archives: Aesthetic
When CEQA Gets Ugly: Third District Holds Lay Public Opinion Supports Fair Argument That Project May Have Significant Aesthetic Effect Requiring EIR
In a published opinion filed December 17, 2018, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment granting a writ setting aside El Dorado County’s approval of, and related Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for, construction of a Dollar General Store … Continue reading
Brian Soucek on Aesthetic Judgment in Law
As noted in my last post, one of the most quoted lines in copyright law is from Justice Holmes's 1903 opinion in Bleistein: "It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only to the law to constitute themselves final … Continue reading
Kerr on Aesthetic Play and Bad Intent @GeorgetownLaw
Andrew Jensen Kerr, Georgetown University Law Center, is publishing Aesthetic Play and Bad Intent in Minneosta Law Review Headnotes (2018) (forthcoming). Here is the abstract. Threatening words or images are assumed by American courts to be non-art. But this threshold … Continue reading
