This doesn't fall into the category of "what in the world were they thinking?" It may or may not qualify as a case of trademark bullying. But I'll bet anyone a ham sandwich that Proctor & Gamble will be ( or already is) sorry that they decided to make life miserable for a wealthy preteen girl and her mother. It's never a good sign when your adversary and her mother are photographed as part of a human interest story in the New York Times. You can find a link to the story here. In a nutshell, Willa, an 8 year old girl complains to her mother about not wanting to use kids shampoo. This is aha moment for Willa's mom, Christine Prunier. Fast forward three years. Mom has developed a line of bath products and skincare products targeted directly at preteen girls. And the brand name for this line of ducts? WILLA, of course. Ms. Prunier also developed a design to accompany the brand. And she sought to federally register Willa and Design with the US Trademark Office. No problem said the Trademark Office. Big Problem said Procter & Gamble. P & G owns the brand WELLA, as used on a line of shampoo products sold primarily though hair salons. P & G tried to stop Willa and her mom from federally registering their WILLA and Design trademark. Here's where the story gets interesting. Turns out Ms. Prunier is a woman of means. After getting advice from a family y friend, she filed a lawsuit against P & G in NYC. Ms. Prunier is asking for a finding that the term WILLA used with a charming design of a young girl, does not legally infringe the term WELLA. Oh by the way, she asked for a jury trial. When I first read this story I immediately thought of how my son kicks my butt at basketball, baseball and chess. Whenever he whips me I tell him (bursting with pride) "Son, with you, when I lose I win and when I win I win." But the reverse is also true if you are Procter & Gamble. When you take on an 11 year old girl, whether you win or lose, you lose.

Read more detail on Recent Intellectual Property Law Posts –

This entry was posted in Intellectual Property and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. air ionizer says:

    Competition in the detergent market in India is of interest for several reasons on both a macro- and micro-economic levels. On a macroeconomic level, one-sixth of the world’s population is in India. Furthermore, GDP per capita measurements indicate a steady rise in income levels in this newly industrializing nation. From a microeconomic perspective, this paper addresses a strategic game involving price wars between two market leaders in the detergent market, Unilever and Procter & Gamble (P&G). Lastly, ethical considerations will be discussed as it relates to the importance of considering exogenous ‘losers’ as a result of engaged players in this strategic games; namely, mom and pop Indian shops that sell detergent products.

  2. I started thinking about
    ways the RCMP could possibly help “seal the deal” with these ships to
    increase our tourism market. That’s when I came up with one of my
    many hare-brained ideas.

Leave a Reply