Leval on fair use

At a talk today (should be posted in about a week), Judge Leval gave a beautiful explanation of why good faith/bad faith shouldn’t matter to fair use. Boiled down and stripped of its eloquence: (1) A publisher should be able to examine the relevant works side by side and determine whether the use is fair, without investigating the good faith of the second author/the means by which the second author acquired access to the first work. (2) The inquiry should be done on the pleadings/summary judgment, and considering good faith makes that difficult.  (3) The ultimate interest in fair use is the public’s, and if the public is entitled to the new work/new use and benefits from it there’s no reason that the defendant’s means of access should matter.Judge Leval also insisted that the fourth fair use factor was the key, even more than factor one, and that therefore the result in TVEyes was correct.  I wish he had addressed the record evidence in that…

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law posts –

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply