House Legislation Would Change Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions to Require Initial Internal Reporting

House legislation would amend SEC and CFTC whistleblower provisions in Dodd-Frank to preserve internal company reporting standards and mechanisms. The legislation would require the whistleblower to first report the information to the company before reporting it to the SEC or CFTC. The whistleblower must report the information to the SEC or CFTC within 180 days of reporting it to the company. The overreaching provisions in Dodd-Frank make internal corporate programs obsolete, open the floodgates of claims to an already overburdened SEC, and delay action within a company, said Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY, sponsor of the Whistleblower Improvement Act (H.R. 2483). The legislation is co-sponsored by House Capital Markets Subcommittee Chair Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Rep. John Campbell (R-CA), and Rep. Steve Stivers (R-OH). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandated that companies have an internal mechanism to report criminal activity, such as an anonymous tip-line. According to Rep. Grimm, these internal compliance programs are important as they protect shareholders and investors and save time and money by stopping a problem before it causes excessive damage. In his view, Dodd-Frank undermines these internal company programs by incentivizing whistleblowers to go directly to the SEC. H.R. 2483 makes internal reporting a prerequisite for such a reward. The legislation carves out exceptions allowing whistleblowers to report directly to the SEC or CFTC in situations when the wrongdoing is conducted by compliance officers or the highest level of management. It also makes an exception for whistleblowers reporting on activity in a company that does not have a robust internal reporting mechanism in place. Rep. Grimm said that these exceptions help protect the whistleblower from retaliation, as well as prevent an investigation from being compromised. Thus, internal reporting is required initially unless the whistleblower alleges, and the Commission determines, that the company lacks either a policy prohibiting retaliation for reporting potential misconduct or an internal reporting system allowing for anonymous reporting, or the Commission determines that internal reporting was not a viable option based on evidence that the alleged misconduct was committed by, or involved the complicity of, the highest level of management or other evidence of company bad faith. The legislation also amends Dodd-Frank to require the SEC and CFTC, prior to commencing any enforcement action based on whistleblower information, to notify the subject company of information received by the Commission from a whistleblower who is a company employee in order to enable the company to investigate the alleged misconduct and take remedial action, unless the Commission determines that notification would jeopardize necessary investigative measures and impede the gathering of relevant facts, based on evidence that the alleged misconduct was committed by, or involved the complicity of, the highest level of management or other evidence of company bad faith on the part of the entity. When a company so notified responds in good faith, which may include conducting an investigation, reporting results of such an investigation to the Commission, and taking appropriate corrective action, the Commission must treat the company as having self-reported the information and its actions in response to such notification must be evaluated in accordance with the Commission's policy statement entitled “Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Statement of the Relationship of Cooperation to Agency Enforcement Decisions.'' Under Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers are guaranteed a payout of 10-30 percent in claims that lead to successful civil or criminal penalties exceeding $1 million. According to Rep. Grimm, this provides an incentive for whistleblowers to allow a criminal act to go unreported in order to increase the penalty to a level that would bring in a reward. It also can cause an influx of frivolous claims from those seeking financial gain, causing the SEC to become overwhelmed. The legislation would change the range from 0 to 30 percent, and thus drop the guarantee. Dodd-Frank also allows those culpable, but not criminally charged, to receive a reward. The legislation would change the rules to provide that someone guilty of wrongdoing who later becomes a whistleblower cannot benefit from his or her own malfeasance. The original draft of the legislation would have prohibited contingency fee arrangements for attorneys representing whistleblowers seeking SEC bounties. The revised draft has been modified to eliminate the contingency fee provision based on testimony received at a May 11, 2011, House Financial Services Committee hearing on the draft. In testimony before the House panel, University of Toledo Law Professor Geoffrey Rapp said that the contingency fee provision would virtually guarantee that no whistleblowers would be represented by talented attorneys in connection with the application for a bounty. He also noted that no such prohibition on contingency fee arrangements exists in other federal bounty programs. The legislation directs the GAO to conduct a study and report to Congress to determine what impact, if any, the whistleblower incentives program established by Dodd-Frank, codified as Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 23 of the Commodity Exchange Act, has had on shareholder value.

Read more detail on Recent Banking and Finance Law Posts –

This entry was posted in Banking and Finance law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to House Legislation Would Change Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions to Require Initial Internal Reporting

  1. That is really fascinating, You’re a very professional blogger. I have joined your feed and stay up for seeking more of your magnificent post. Additionally, I have shared your website in my social networks

  2. Good article. I am dealing with some of these issues as well.

  3. Wow, that’s what I was exploring for, what a data! existing here at this website, thanks admin of this web page.

  4. You’ve made some good points there. I looked on the net to find out more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this site.Gracias

  5. Its such as you learn my thoughts! You appear to grasp
    a lot about this, like you wrote the guide in it or something.
    I think that you just can do with some p.
    c. to pressure the message home a little bit, but instead of that,
    that is great blog. A fantastic read. I’ll certainly be back.

  6. Hello there, I discovered your blog by way of Google even as looking for a similar subject,
    your website got here up, it seems good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    I’m not sure the place you are getting your info, however good topic.
    I needs to spend some time finding out much more or understanding more.
    Thanks for fantastic information I was searching for this
    info for my mission.

  7. Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam comments?
    If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any help is very much appreciated.

  8. Informative article, totally what I wanted to find.

  9. Acne cure says:

    Hi there, its good article on the topic of media print, we all
    be familiar with media is a fantastic source of information.

  10. Thanks designed for sharing such a good idea, piece
    of writing is nice, thats why i have read it completely

  11. You should be a part of a contest for one of the finest websites on the web.
    I am going to recommend this website!

  12. Ι know this if off topіc but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having а blog liκе yourѕ woulԁ сost a prеttу penny?
    І’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

  13. casual says:

    Thanks for finally writing about > House Legislation Would Change Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions to Require Initial Internal Reporting – Legal News Directory < Loved it!

  14. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the structure of your website?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you
    could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it
    better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 pictures.

    Maybe you could space it out better?

  15. A borrowing arrangement is actually a form of personal debt.

    Including many debt devices, credit incorporates any redistribution of money
    assets as time passes, between your mortgage company and also buyer.

    In the loan product, the particular client at first is provided with
    as well as borrows some cash, identified as the main, with the mortgage lender,
    as well as being required to be charged back again or maybe pay back
    the same sum of money towards mortgage company later.
    Generally, the bucks is usually reimbursed during standard payments, or simply
    incomplete repayment demands; within a annuity, every installation
    is a very same quantity.

Leave a Reply