Georgia Court Discusses Venue Selection in Recent UIM Case

Recently, a state appellate court issued an opinion in a Georgia car accident case discussing what venues are appropriate in a case brought against multiple motorists, one of which was an uninsured motorist (UIM). The case required the court to determine if the venue-selection clause in the state’s UIM statute applies to cases involving a named defendant in addition to an unknown, “John Doe” defendant. Ultimately, the court concluded that the UIM statute did apply, and affirmed the lower court’s decision to deny the named defendant’s request to transfer venue to his home county. Georgia’s Uninsured Motorist Statute as Applied to Hit-and-Run Drivers When a motorist causes an accident, anyone injured as a result of that driver’s negligence can pursue a claim for damages against the driver. However, after a Georgia hit-and-run accident, the injury victim will not be able to file a case against the driver because his identity is unknown.…

Read more detail on Recent Injury and Accident Law posts –

This entry was posted in Injury & Accident Law and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply