Fifth Circuit tells pro se foreclosure plaintiffs in 2nd appeal that their claims shall remain in federal court after removal from state court

Mr. and Mrs. Smith go to the Fifth Circuit – once more. U.S. District Court's denial of motion to remand case to state court affirmed.  OWEN M. SMITH; DANA NORWOOD SMITH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, L.L.P.; STEPHEN C. PORTER; G. TOMMY BASTIAN; NDEX TITLE SERVICES, L.L.C.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF FANNIE MAE GUARANTEED REMIC PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, Fannie Mae REMIC TRUST 2008-16; FNMA AA MSTR/SUB CW BANK; LAURIE MEDER; FANNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2008-16, Defendants-Appellees.No. 16-51010.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed June 12, 2018.Mark D. Hopkins, for Defendant-Appellee.David Andrew Rogers, for Plaintiff-Appellant.Richard Dwayne Danner, for Defendant-Appellee.Nathan Templeton Anderson, for Defendant-Appellee.Thomas Mott Hanson, for Defendant-Appellee.William D. Davis, for Plaintiff-Appellant.Shelley Luan Hopkins, for Defendant-Appellee.Appeal…

Read more detail on Recent Banking and Finance Law posts –

This entry was posted in Banking and Finance law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply