Eligibility of guarantees as unfunded credit protection under the CRR

In February, the PRA published a consultation paper containing its proposals as to how the eligibility criteria for guarantees to be treated as unfunded credit protection under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) should be interpreted (our blog is here). Those proposals have proved to be controversial. In particular the PRA: suggests that the requirement for the guarantor to be obliged, contractually, to pay out ‘in a timely manner’ means that the pay-out should be made without delay and “within days, but not weeks or months”, of the date on which the obligor fails to make payment. This proposal, if correct, would render most export credit cover and credit insurance policies ineligible as credit risk mitigants for CRR purposes; further suggests that the requirement for institutions to obtain legal opinions in respect of the effectiveness and enforceability of credit risk mitigants under Article 194(1) CRR goes much further than is current market…

Read more detail on Recent Banking and Finance Law posts –

This entry was posted in Banking and Finance law and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply