Civil deputy sheriff should not have to wait to be harmed before being given weapon and firearms training
Civil deputy sheriff should not have to wait to be harmed before being given weapon and firearms training Mtr. of Monroe County Deputy Sheriffs Assoc.; Arbitration Award, PERB Case A200-439 Monroe County and the Monroe County Deputy Sheriffs Association submitted the following issue to PERB Arbitrator James A. Gross: Whether the Monroe County Sheriff's Office created an unusual work condition by failing to provide firearms and proper training in connection with firearms for the Civil Bureau. Holding that the Sheriff's Office did, in fact, create an unusual work condition by failing to provide civil deputy sheriffs with firearms and training, Arbitrator Gross directed that Monroe County "provide firearms to civil deputies when they perform their duties." The parties apparently conceded that the grievance, as presented to the arbitrator, was subject to the contract grievance procedure pursuant to Article 36.2.1. of the collective bargaining agreement. Article 36.2.1 set out the definition of a grievance and provides as follows: A grievance shall be defined as any claimed violation of a specific provision of this agreement, or any matter that relates to employee health and safety. The County argued that "the issuance of weapons does not comply with the duties and functions of non-criminal civil deputies position [sic]" and that its civil deputies are not performing police functions. The County also maintained that there was no evidence that any civil deputy had been injured performing his or her duties "for at least 30 years" as a result of his or her performing civil deputy sheriff duties. The Association contended that the civil deputies should carry a weapon because they are perceived to be law enforcement personnel and displayed badges. According to the Association: 1. A badge is recognized as a police presence; and 2. Any person identified as a law enforcement officer is automatically in a high-risk situation either by becoming a target for hostility or by being drawn into hostile and dangerous situations involving others. Arbitrator Gross ruled that the County violated Article 36.2.1 by failing to provide firearms to its civil deputy sheriffs. After considering the testimony of witnesses, the arbitrator's concluded that:It would be irresponsible to deny these Civil Deputies the equipment they need to meet the greatest threats to their safety simply because no Civil Deputy in Monroe County has been killed or seriously injured in the performance of their duties – as has happened elsewhere in New York State. No person should have to wait to be harmed before being given adequate protection.
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- Procedural considerations relevant to conducting a disciplinary hearing pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law
- Section 75 of the Civil Service Law limits suspension without pay to thirty days notwithstanding the individual's being found guilty of the charges
- A DEFENDANT NEED NOT WAIT TO BE ARRAIGNED ON A TRAFFIC TICKET BEFORE HE CAN RIGHTFULLY REQUEST A SUPPORTING DEPOSITION. HE MAY REQUEST A SUPPORTING DEPOSITION WHEN
- NRC and DOJ Issue Updated Firearms Guidelines for Licensee Security Personnel
- Lake Co. deputy charged with domestic battery
- No charges yet; should I hire a DUI attorney now or can I wait?
- What Firearms Law and Regulatory Scholarship Can Learn from Each Other
- Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Staton confident Kyron Horman investigation won’t end up in the cold case files
- Can I Be Sentenced to Prison for Firearm or Weapon Possession in New Jersey?
This entry was posted in Administrative law
and tagged Before
. Bookmark the permalink