Argument preview: Texas redistricting battles return to the court

Since October, the Supreme Court has heard oral argument in two major redistricting battles, involving allegations of partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin and Maryland. When the justices take the bench next Tuesday, they will hear oral argument in a third redistricting dispute, this time involving allegations that Texas lawmakers drew federal congressional and state legislative districts that harmed some of the state’s black and Hispanic residents. The tale of the two cases known as Abbott v. Perez is a long and complicated one. It began in 2011, when Texas’ Republican-controlled legislature began redistricting in the wake of the 2010 census, which indicated that Texas had gained over four million new residents, who were predominantly minorities; that population growth meant that the state would get four new seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. But the plan that the legislature created never went into effect. A three-judge district court (the normal forum…

Read more detail on Recent Constitutional Law posts –

This entry was posted in Constitutional Law and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply