YSL v Costco, Quality King, et al, – Third Party Practice

Plaintiff YSL alleged that CostCo sold various infringing goods. Cosco purchased the goods from Quality King, Quality King purchased the goods from J&H. QK asserted a range of claims against J&H and its principal, Gerald Schmeltzer. This decision provides guidance on: (1) standard for allowing a motion to amend a complaint; (2) piercing the corporate veil; (3) how to plead various third party claims in an IP context. Decision Ysl v Costco Quality King Third Party Practice

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –

Legal notice about the YSL v Costco, Quality King, et al, – Third Party Practice rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to YSL v Costco, Quality King, et al, – Third Party Practice?

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply