World Investor Week: CFTC’s FinTech Forward 2018 and SEC, NFA, FINRA Events
World Investor Week is a 7 day global campaign dedicated to investor protection and education. The CFTC, NFA ,SEC and FINRA will participate. The post World Investor Week: CFTC’s FinTech Forward 2018 and SEC, NFA, FINRA Events appeared first on CFTC Law.
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law posts –
Legal notice about the World Investor Week: CFTC’s FinTech Forward 2018 and SEC, NFA, FINRA Events
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to World Investor Week: CFTC’s FinTech Forward 2018 and SEC, NFA, FINRA Events?
- Speaking at Two Local Events This Week
- The Dumb Money Investor Was Crushed This Week In The Stock Market
- RP Celebrates International Seafarer’s Week and the World Maritime Day
- Fintech is thriving! Global investment more than doubles in 2018
- The Joint Commission releases sentinel events for 2018
- Events & Opportunities: Even More March 2018/More April 2018
- Investor concerns, compliance risks top OCIE 2018 exam priorities
- Turning the Page on 2018 and Looking Forward to 2019
- FINRA Disciplinary Action Report August 2018
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm