Duick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 2011 WL 3834740 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. August 31, 2011) Someone signed plaintiff up through a Toyota website to take part in a "Personality Evaluation." She got an email with a link to website, and on the second page of the website that she had to click through, she was presented with the well-known check box next to the words ""I have read and agree to the terms and conditions." Later plaintiff started getting creepy emails from an unknown male calling himself "Sebastian Bowler" who indicated that he was on a cross-country road trip to come and visit plaintiff. He even listed plaintiff's physical address. One of the emails had a link to the Bowler's MySpace page, which revealed he "enjoyed drinking alcohol to excess." A few days later plaintiff got another email from someone purporting to be the manager of the hotel in which Bowler had trashed a room, and attempted to bill plaintiff for the damage. As one would expect, plaintiff was disturbed by these messages. She finally got an email with a link to a video that said Bowler was a fictional character and that the emails were part of an elaborate prank, all to advertise the Toyota Matrix. Plaintiff sued Toyota for, among other things, infliction of emotional distress. Toyota moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the online terms and conditions contained an arbitration provision, so the case did not belong in court but before an arbitrator. The court rejected this argument, finding that the terms and conditions were void, because plaintiff's agreement to them was procured by "fraud in the inception or execution." The court found that the terms and conditions led plaintiff to believe that she was going to participate in a personality evaluation and nothing more. A reasonable reader in plaintiff's position would not have known that she was signing up to be the target of a prank. For example, the terms and conditions were under the heading "Personality Evaluation Terms and Conditions" and made vague and opaque references to terms such as "interactive experience" and a "digital experience." Simply stated, plaintiff, through no fault of her own, did not know what she was getting herself into. For these reasons, the court held that the terms and conditions were void, and all the provisions contained in those terms and conditions, including the purported agreement to arbitrate any disputes, did not bind the parties.
Read more detail on Recent Copyright Posts –Legal notice about the Website terms and conditions were unenforceable because of fraud rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Website terms and conditions were unenforceable because of fraud?