Warring couple show why solicitors are essential to divorce

Family law is no joking matter. By its very nature, more often than not it deals with distressed families at a difficult time. But every now and then, a situation comes along where you have to see the funny side. In this instance, it is a judge in Canada highlighting the idiocy off a couple who simply will not reach a settlement. Faced with a feuding couple who had "been marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder requiring treatment", Justice Quinn, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, decided in the case of Bruni -v-Bruni that "the parties repeatedly have shown that they are immune to reason. Consequently, in my decision, I have tried ridicule as a last resort." What followed was a damning, humorous but gut-wrenchingly honest account of the parties' behaviour, including parental-alienation behaviour described as "evil" and repeated threats to kill. At one point in the trial, Justice Quinn asked the mother: "If you could push a button and make father disappear from the face of the earth, would you push it?" Her I-just-won-a-lottery smile implied the answer that was expected. Both parties acted in person. They allowed their emotions to dominate proceedings and were unable to take any reasonable or objective view. Solicitors often get accused of making situations worse. It's claimed they encourage hostility but in nearly every case the opposite is true. We know that our role is to take a distanced and sometimes cold, dispassionate view and give our clients clear, honest advice in order to achieve the best result for them. The way this particular case was dealt with does help make a serious point. The lawyer for the children in the case, a Mr Leduc – the only lawyer involved – appears to be the only person offered praise by Justice Quinn: "Mr Leduc… conducted himself in a fair-minded manner, impartial to the parties, always alert to the best interests of the children." In short, Mr Leduc did precisely what was expected of him and demonstrated precisely why it is essential for any couple going through a divorce to engage an experienced family lawyer to ensure not only the best settlement, but also that proceedings move as swiftly and successfully as possible for all concerned. Ian Giddings Family lawyer Ian Giddings is a solicitor at Woolley & Co and Chair of Coventry & Warwickshire Resolution, an organisation committed to encouraging families to resolve their differences constructively and without conflict.

Read more detail on Recent Family Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Warring couple show why solicitors are essential to divorce rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Warring couple show why solicitors are essential to divorce?

This entry was posted in Divorce Law and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Warring couple show why solicitors are essential to divorce

  1. Solicitors are lawyers who traditionally deal with any legal matter including conducting proceedings in courts. The training and qualification required to enter the profession by being admitted as a solicitor is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. There are two graduate routes of entry into the profession. Prospective solicitors holding a qualifying law degree proceed to enrol with the Law Society as a student member and study the Legal Practice Course. Those holding a non law degree but one which is a “qualifying degree” must in addition completed a conversion course prior to enrolling on the Legal Practice Course. Once the Legal Practice Course has been completed, the prospective solicitor usually must then undertake two years’ apprenticeship, known as a training contract, with a firm entitled to take trainee solicitors.

Leave a Reply