Northern District Cal. enjoins Second Life from removing Plaintiff's virtual horses on Second Life, subject of DMCA takedown notice sent by defendant (who alleges that plaintiff infringed its virtual bunnies software). Hardly any 17 USC 512(f) actions in a decade, then two in two months. 512(f) is the notional safeguard against DMCA abuse. Prof Goldman discusses fact that Second Life, not a party to the suit, is enjoined, not defendant. I think he's right, all other things being equal, that a company like Second Life would not want to be told that it can't remove something from its service. Decision TRO Re DMCA Second Life
Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –Legal notice about the Virtual Horses Enjoin Second Life From Enforcing Virtual Bunnies DMCA Notice Under Sec 512(f) rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Virtual Horses Enjoin Second Life From Enforcing Virtual Bunnies DMCA Notice Under Sec 512(f)?