Unit determinations and substitute teachers

Unit determinations and substitute teachers In the Matter of North Syracuse Central School District, PERB Decision C-2367 The 1981 amendment to the Taylor Law providing for representation of per diem substitute teachers (Chapter 814, Law of 1981) has required PERB to consider a number of "unit" questions. The Board ruled that per diem substitutes whose employer gives them reasonable assurance of continuing employment should not be placed in "fractionalized units" within a school district depending on the frequency or infrequency of their employment. PERB indicated that the authors of amendment "saw no difficulty in multiple representation of (such) per diem substitute teachers who hold … substitute teaching positions" with a number of school districts. Finally, the decision indicates that "the status of per diem substitutes who did not receive a reasonable assurance of continuing employment was not changed by the 1981 amendment. (See Section 201.7(d) of the Civil Service Law.)

Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Unit determinations and substitute teachers rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Unit determinations and substitute teachers?

This entry was posted in Administrative law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply