Union's lawsuit alleging a breach of the CBA held subject to a six-year statute of limitations, not a four-month period for an Article 78 action

Union's lawsuit alleging a breach of the CBA held subject to a six-year statute of limitations, not a four-month period for an Article 78 action Arkport Staff United v Arkport Cent. School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 09745, Appellate Division, Fourth Department The Arkport Staff United claimed that members were entitled to longevity increases under Article 27 of a collective bargaining agreement between it and the Arkport Central School District. Claiming that the union's lawsuit was untimely, the School District asked Supreme Court to dismiss the union's petition court in view of the four-month statute of limitations applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings. Supreme Court denied Arkport's motion. The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's determination, holding that the union's action was subject to the six-year statute of limitations applicable to "breach of contract" actions rather than the four-month statute of limitations controlling filing an Article 78 action. As the union's "underlying claim" is an action on the contract – in this instance a collective bargaining agreement — the Appellate Division said that its lawsuit was timely as it had been commenced "within six years of the alleged breach" of the agreement. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_09745.htm

Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Union's lawsuit alleging a breach of the CBA held subject to a six-year statute of limitations, not a four-month period for an Article 78 action rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Union's lawsuit alleging a breach of the CBA held subject to a six-year statute of limitations, not a four-month period for an Article 78 action?

This entry was posted in Administrative law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply