Twitter isn't required to include an arbitration clause

Posted on January 10, 2019 by lawhukukinet

In a recent case out of the District of Arizona, Brittain v. Twitter Inc., No. CV-18-01714-PHX-DG (behind paywall), a court finds Twitter's terms enforceable as neither illusory nor unconscionable. The plaintiffs admitted that they agreed to Twitter's terms of service,…

Read more detail on Recent Business Law posts –

Related posts:

  1. Arbitration Clause Not Enforceable if Procured by Fraud
  2. Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference
  3. A broad arbitration clause still must satisfy the "reasonable relationship test" for a court to grant a petition to compel arbitration
  4. Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-09-19
  5. Law Firms, Arbitration Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property Registration under One Roof
  6. Twitter reminder
  7. DOJ to Waxman: Violating Net Neutrality Isn't Anticompetitive
  8. Even if a CBA's arbitration clause is broadly worded, a matter may be excluded from arbitration if the CBA's language clearly shows such an intent
  9. Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration Rules, 2011:
  10. Tangled Web, Part II: Taymor and Spiderman Go to Arbitration
This entry was posted in Business law and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply