The Ninth Circuit Rules on Plan Feasibility
In the case of Sherman v. Harbin (In re Harbin), the Ninth Circuit decided that in determining feasibility of a plan under Bankruptcy Code Section 1129(a)(11), a court must evaluate the possible impact of pending litigation whether at the trial level or on appeal.
The appellant in this action was an aggrieved creditor that had filed a state court action, obtained a judgment and had that judgment overturned. The creditor appealed the reversal, and filed a proof of claim and an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy case. The bankruptcy court ruled against the creditor and denied the creditor a claim on the basis of the ruling in the state court action, but left open the possibility of allowing the creditor a claim if the creditor was ultimately successful on the appeal. The creditor ultimately was successful on appeal.
The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Bankruptcy Court had erred in not evaluating the impact and likelihood of a successful appeal on the feasibility of the Debtors plan of reorganization. The Court seemingly expanded their decision in Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakeys, Inc. (In re Pizza of Hawaii), 761 F2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1985) to require the court to evaluate not only open and unresolved litigation, but also to include an evaluation of litigation that is final but subject to appeal, when determining feasibility of a plan of reorganization.
The dissent pointed out that the lower court made a proper determination of feasibility based on the law at the time of confirmation and stated that the majoritys ruling could undermine the importance of finality in bankruptcy proceedings.
By: Kyle J. Mathews
Read more detail on Legal News Directory – Bankruptcy Law
- Ninth Circuit rules tattoo parlors protected by First Amendment [JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Thursday invalidated [opinion, PDF] a municipal ban on tattoo parlors by Hermosa Beach, California, calling it […]
- NINTH CIRCUIT RULES PUNITIVE DAMAGES AVAILABLE TO INJURED SEAMAN AND FISHERMAN The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that injured seaman and fisherman may claim punitive damages under the general maritime law unseaworthiness doctrine. The Ninth Circuit Court […]
- Ninth Circuit rules Clean Water Act permit required for indirect discharge to ocean waters It was a great exam question (at least I thought so — you’ll have to ask my Environmental Law and Policy students if they agree): does the disposal of treated wastewater from a municipal […]
- Asylum Update: Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ Policy Can Continue, the Ninth Circuit Rules On May 7, the Ninth Circuit stayed an injunction against the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” policy. That policy, officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), […]
- Ninth Circuit Rules on the Appropriate Economic Analysis Approach in Designating Critical Habitats Under the Endangered Species Act The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently clarified the proper approach to be applied in analyzing the economic impacts of designating critical habitats for endangered or threatened […]
- Eleventh Circuit Rules that Express Threat of Litigation Not Required to Implicate FDCPA On April 5, 2019, in Holzman v. Malcom S. Gerald & Assocs., Inc., 2019 WL 1495642, the Eleventh Circuit held that an express threat of litigation is not required to state a claim under […]
- NINTH CIRCUIT CONFIRMS EXISTENCE OF RIDE THROUGH DOCTRINE IN CHAPTER 11 CASES In Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. JZ, LLC (In re JZ, LLC), No. 07-1011 (9th Cir. B.A.P., June 18, 2007), the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed a Bankruptcy Court decision […]
- Ninth Circuit “Proceeds” to Clarify the Definition of “Goods”: The Proceeds of Goods are Goods In a soon to be published opinion, IPC (USA), Inc. v. Ellis (In re Pettit Oil, Co), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that the definition of “goods” as […]
- Ninth Circuit Says Local Rule 90-Day Deadline to File Class Certification Motion Incompatible With Federal Rule 23 In a case with potentially nationwide ramifications, the Ninth Circuit reversed a California district court’s decision striking a motion for class certification as untimely, finding the […]
- Ninth Circuit Joins Fourth Circuit in Holding That CAFA's Class Action Removal Provisions Do Not Apply to State Parens Patriae Suits It has certainly taken me long enough to get around to posting about it, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion earlier this month that raises an important issue for those of us who […]
This entry was posted in Bankruptcy Law
and tagged Circuit
. Bookmark the permalink