The Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch Believes a Coupon-Driven Class Action Settlement Is “Unfair” and States it Is Cracking Down on “Unfair” Class Action Settlement Proposals

Is the government about to make it harder for companies to settle consumer class actions? The Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch, in a Statement of Interest (Statement), has requested that a Judge set aside a proposed class action settlement that would enrich plaintiffs’ attorneys to the tune of nearly $2 million. Specifically, the DOJ argues that the settlement, in the form of coupons, would “transfer a massive $1.7 million windfall payment to plaintiffs’ counsel” and that such a payout outweighs the harm incurred by consumers. The DOJ, under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), receives proposed settlement notices from the participating defendants, and may issue a Statement of Interest to the presiding court if it believes a settlement is unfair or unreasonable. In Cannon v. Ashburn Corp., No. 1:16-cv-01452, 2016 WL 7130913 (D.N.J. Dec. 7, 2016), the plaintiffs alleged that a wine distribution member website, Wines…

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law posts –

Legal notice about the The Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch Believes a Coupon-Driven Class Action Settlement Is “Unfair” and States it Is Cracking Down on “Unfair” Class Action Settlement Proposals rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to The Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch Believes a Coupon-Driven Class Action Settlement Is “Unfair” and States it Is Cracking Down on “Unfair” Class Action Settlement Proposals?

Last search terms:

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply