That Purple Cereal

As you likely know, many of the Duets Blog bloggers were involved in a full day trademark CLE last week. One of the sessions focused on the issues facing private label brands and the line between identifying your competitor by using similar packaging and infringing on their trademark or trade dress. Along those lines, a friend recently sent me the picture below and asked my opinion of this packaging. In the interest of continuing the conversation, I thought I would post the picture here and see what our viewing audience thinks. Is it reasonable for the private label brand to use both the main color (purple) and the secondary color (yellow) as well as a highly similar font, font color, and outline color? Or maybe you think everyone has the right to use purple with raisin filled cereals? Even General Mills uses purple with its raisin filled Total Cereal (credit to the Big G for calling its something other than "raisin bran"). What about the use of "Raisin Bran"? Kellogg's owns a trademark registration for Kellogg's Raisin Bran and the Sun Design. However, like all registered marks containing "raisin bran," the term has been disclaimed. Does the similar font, color, and outline cross the line? Please share your thoughts on private label brand and this example!

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –

Legal notice about the That Purple Cereal rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to That Purple Cereal?

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply