Categories
- Administrative law (3,493)
- Admiralty-Maritime Law (2,514)
- Advertising Law (2,069)
- Antitrust – Competition law (735)
- Aviation Law (959)
- Banking and Finance law (1,951)
- Bankruptcy Law (1,397)
- Business law (2,076)
- Constitutional Law (688)
- Contract Law (44)
- Copyright Law (1,415)
- Corporate Law (1,455)
- Criminal Law (1,149)
- Divorce Law (2,187)
- Elder Law (117)
- Employment and Labour Law (1,216)
- Environmental Law (653)
- Estate Planning (691)
- Family Law (1,070)
- General Legal News (225)
- Health Law (1,261)
- Immigration law (883)
- Injury & Accident Law (1,390)
- Insurance (664)
- Intellectual Property (1,357)
- International Law (569)
- Judiciary (562)
- Law Librarians (1,800)
- Law Professors (1,118)
- Law Students (993)
- Legal Ethics (306)
- Legal Marketing (1,086)
- Legal Theory (707)
- Medical malpractice law (1,204)
- Products Liability (847)
- Real Estate & Property Law (938)
- Securities Law (732)
- Seogpst (2)
- Tax Law (1,059)
- Technology & Cyberlaw (1,526)
- World (729)
- Germany (3)
- Writings and Citations (4)
Tag Archives: U.S.C.
The Third Circuit Recognizes Snap Removal Practice Falls Within Plain Meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2)
After oral argument before The Honorable Michael A. Chagares, The Honorable Kent A. Jordan, and The Honorable Julio M. Fuentes, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit by Opinion entered in Encompass Insurance Co. v. Stone Mansion … Continue reading
Posted in Antitrust - Competition law
Tagged 1441b2, Circuit, Falls, MEANING, Plain, practice, Recognizes, removal, snap, third, U.S.C., Within
Leave a comment
Beware Indefiniteness under Williamson and 35 U.S.C. §112(f)
Functional patent claim language not only justified an Examiner’s indefiniteness rejections under 35 USC § 112(b), but also justified a new ground of indefiniteness rejection in In re Xie, Ex parte Appeal 2017-000540, Application 12/774,138 (March 20, 2018). Why? Because … Continue reading
Posted in Copyright Law
Tagged §112f, beware, Indefiniteness, U.S.C., under, Williamson
Leave a comment
Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings After Finding Claims of Patent-in-Suit Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §101
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in 3G Licensing, S.A. et al. v. Blackberry Ltd. et al., Civil Action No. 17-82-LPS-CJB (D.Del. March 22, 2018) (consolidated), the Court granted Defendants’ motion pursuant to Federal Rule of … Continue reading
Posted in Antitrust - Competition law
Tagged §101, chief, claims, defendants, Finding, grants, invalid, Judge, Judgment, Motion, PatentinSuit, Pleadings, stark, U.S.C., under
Leave a comment
35 U.S.C. § 102 (newly amended by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011)
As a site for referral and contemplation, I wanted to include the text of the newly drafted statute 35 U.S.C. § 102. Sec. 102. Conditions for patentability; novelty (a) Novelty; Prior Art- A person shall be entitled to a patent … Continue reading
Posted in Intellectual Property
Tagged 2011, Amended, America, Invents, LeahySmith, Newly, U.S.C.
Leave a comment
Robert C. Sasser Pled Guilty in Columbia Federal Court to Wire Fraud in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 29, 2011 released the following: "West Columbia Man Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud COLUMBIA, SC- United States Attorney Bill Nettles stated today that Robert C. Sasser, age 31, of West Columbia, pled … Continue reading