Categories
- Administrative law (3,493)
- Admiralty-Maritime Law (2,514)
- Advertising Law (2,069)
- Antitrust – Competition law (735)
- Aviation Law (959)
- Banking and Finance law (1,951)
- Bankruptcy Law (1,397)
- Business law (2,076)
- Constitutional Law (688)
- Contract Law (44)
- Copyright Law (1,415)
- Corporate Law (1,455)
- Criminal Law (1,149)
- Divorce Law (2,187)
- Elder Law (117)
- Employment and Labour Law (1,216)
- Environmental Law (653)
- Estate Planning (691)
- Family Law (1,070)
- General Legal News (225)
- Health Law (1,261)
- Immigration law (883)
- Injury & Accident Law (1,390)
- Insurance (664)
- Intellectual Property (1,357)
- International Law (569)
- Judiciary (562)
- Law Librarians (1,800)
- Law Professors (1,118)
- Law Students (993)
- Legal Ethics (306)
- Legal Marketing (1,086)
- Legal Theory (707)
- Medical malpractice law (1,204)
- Products Liability (847)
- Real Estate & Property Law (938)
- Securities Law (732)
- Seogpst (2)
- Tax Law (1,059)
- Technology & Cyberlaw (1,526)
- World (729)
- Germany (3)
- Writings and Citations (4)
Tag Archives: promotion"
supplement guide isn't "advertising or promotion" under the Lanham Act, even w/undisclosed affiliation
Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp., 2019 WL 1040135, No. 17CV320-LAB (BGS) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2019)Previous iteration discussed here. Arrix competes fiercely with Usana in the nutritional supplement market. NutriSearch publishes the NutriSearch Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements, a guide … Continue reading
Posted in Advertising Law
Tagged "advertising, Affiliation, Even, Guide, isn't, Lanham, promotion", supplement, under, w/undisclosed
Leave a comment
Claims in contracts aren't "advertising or promotion"
Segerdahl Corp. v. American Litho, Inc., No. 17-cv-3015, 2019 WL 157924 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 10, 2019)This opinion deals with Lanham Act/coordinate state law counterclaims by American Litho against Segerdahl. The parties compete within the direct mail service market, a subset … Continue reading
Posted in Advertising Law
Tagged "advertising, aren't, claims, Contracts, promotion"
Leave a comment
Threat letters aren't "advertising or promotion"
Luxpro Corp. v. Apple Inc., 2011 WL 1086027 (N.D. Cal.) Luxpro and Apple compete to sell mp3 players. In previous scuffles, Luxpro was forced to abandon the name "Super Shuffle" and use "Super Tangent" instead for one of its products … Continue reading
Threat letters aren't "advertising or promotion"
Luxpro Corp. v. Apple Inc., 2011 WL 1086027 (N.D. Cal.) Luxpro and Apple compete to sell mp3 players. In previous scuffles, Luxpro was forced to abandon the name "Super Shuffle" and use "Super Tangent" instead for one of its products … Continue reading
Threat letters aren't "advertising or promotion"
Luxpro Corp. v. Apple Inc., 2011 WL 1086027 (N.D. Cal.) Luxpro and Apple compete to sell mp3 players. In previous scuffles, Luxpro was forced to abandon the name "Super Shuffle" and use "Super Tangent" instead for one of its products … Continue reading