Tag Archives: invalid

Delaware Court Holds Charter Provision Designating a Federal Forum for Section 11 Claims is Invalid

One idea circulating since the U.S. Supreme Court held in Cyan that state court Section 11 actions are not removable to federal court is that companies could avoid state court actions by adopting a federal forum bylaw or charter provision. … Continue reading

Posted in Insurance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

4 Reasons Why a Prenuptial Agreement May Be Found Invalid

Prenuptial agreements are legal documents that are designed to help couples avoid contentious disagreements and extensive litigation if they decide to get a divorce. In reality, you may still need to go to court if your prenuptial agreement (or “prenup”) … Continue reading

Posted in Divorce Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

USPTO holds key claims of core Twitter patent invalid: Indian inventor was first

Yesterday the United States Patent and Trademark Office had bad news for a particularly broad member of Twitter's key patent family, U.S. Patent No. 9,088,532 on a "device[-]independent message disribution platform." As I reported in March, the '532 patent is … Continue reading

Posted in Technology & Cyberlaw | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Judge Sleet Concludes that Asserted Claims of Patent In-Suit Are Not Invalid Due to Obviousness-Type Double Patenting and No Grounds for Prosecution Laches Are Present

Following a four-day bench trial before him in Shire Orphan Therapies LLC et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Civil Action No. 15-1102-GMS (D.Del. June 5, 2018), and having considered the entire record in the case and the applicable law, … Continue reading

Posted in Antitrust - Competition law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings After Finding Claims of Patent-in-Suit Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §101

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in 3G Licensing, S.A. et al. v. Blackberry Ltd. et al., Civil Action No. 17-82-LPS-CJB (D.Del. March 22, 2018) (consolidated), the Court granted Defendants’ motion pursuant to Federal Rule of … Continue reading

Posted in Antitrust - Competition law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment