Supreme Court to Resolve Punitive Damages for Jones Act Seamen
On December 7, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Dutra Group v. Batterton (18-266). As we reported on August 13, 2018, the Ninth Circuit ruled earlier this year in Batterton v. Dutra Group, __ F.3d __, No. 15-56775 (9thCir. 2018) that punitive damages are available to an injured seaman in unseaworthiness actions, rejecting the ruling and analysis of the Fifth Circuit in McBride v. Estis Well Services, LLC, 768 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2014). This created a direct conflict between the circuits, and the Supreme Court will address this matter to resolve the circuit split. This is a very important issue to all maritime interests and certainly appropriate for Supreme Court resolution. We anticipate that numerous amicus briefs will be submitted on both sides of this issue. We will report developments as they occur. The post Supreme Court to Resolve Punitive Damages for Jones Act Seamen appeared first on MBLB.
Read more detail on Recent Admiralty Law posts –
- Punitive Damages Not Recoverable in Contract Breach, Supreme Court Rules Punitive damages are not recoverable in a breach-of-contract lawsuit unless the breach involves a tort, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled today.
Read more detail on Recent Judiciary posts - […]
- Circuits Split on Punitive Damages for Unseaworthiness An overriding premise of admiralty and maritime law is the quest for uniformity. Over the centuries, this has proven problematic, as this area of law is largely not based on statute, but […]
- Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms $79.5 Punitive Damages Award in Williams In an opinion issued today the Oregon Supreme Court reaffirmed a $79.5 million punitive damages award in Williams v. Philip Morris Inc., following remand by the Supreme Court in Philip […]
- Tennessee Supreme Court Sustains Punitive Damages Award Against DaimlerChrysler Corp. Flax v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. arose out of the death of eight-month old Joshua Flax when the Dodge Grand Caravan his grandfather was driving was rear-ended by a pickup truck that was […]
- Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Jones Act Case, Dutra Group v. Batterton On Monday, March 25, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held oral argument on Dutra Group v. Batterton in an attempt to resolve a circuit split. The Jones Act case reached the Supreme […]
- How Does Maritime Law Protect Injured Seamen? A Jones Act Lawyer Explains The Jones Act is an important law that protects injured seamen. Find out from a Jones Act lawyer how this Act can provide important protection to seamen who get hurt. The post How Does […]
- Tanker Company Tries to Get Seamen To Give up Jones Act Rights As a maritime lawyer, I've known for a while that maritime companies are trying to get arbitration agreements that release a seaman from his Jones Act rights in exchange for advancing […]
- How Does the Jones Act Protect Injured Seamen? A Jones Act Lawyer Explains The Jones Act is an important law that protects injured seamen. Find out from a Jones Act lawyer how this Act can provide important protection to seamen who get hurt. The post How Does […]
- NINTH CIRCUIT RULES PUNITIVE DAMAGES AVAILABLE TO INJURED SEAMAN AND FISHERMAN The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that injured seaman and fisherman may claim punitive damages under the general maritime law unseaworthiness doctrine. The Ninth Circuit Court […]
- Injured Fishermen Entitled to Punitive Damages in Cases of Unseaworthiness In a precedent-setting case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that injured fishermen and seamen are indeed entitled to punitive damages under maritime law […]