Southfield Criminal Defense Lawyer Predicts That Charges Of Embezzlement and Using A Computer To Commit A Crime Will Be Dismissed Due to Expiration Of The Statute Of Limitations

If you find yourself repeating, from time to time, the following phrase: "Now, where did I put that $100,000.00 again"? You may be in serious need of a good to-do list. And don't forget to remember to remind yourself that there's an App for that! One thing that the victim in this embezzlement case didn't forget to do, however, was to seek a criminal complaint for the crimes of Embezzlement (MCL 750.174) and Using a Computer to Commit a Crime (MCL 752.796 and MCL 752.797) through the Kent County Prosecutor's Office in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Under the circumstances, both felonies are punishable by up to 20 years in prison. According to attorney Gary McInerney, his former secretary, Wendy Bernard, stole the money while working as a secretary for McInerney's law firm. The incident allegedly occurred in 2004. Which raises the question of legal defenses. One that should be leaping off of the page for Ms. Bernard's Grand Rapids criminal defense lawyer is the Michigan statute of limitations. That is because the residual statute of limitations for crimes (not specifically subject to other such statutory deadlines) is 6 years, MCL 767.24(5). As always, every case is fact-driven. Thus, if Ms. Bernard was residing out of state, the statute of limitations might not apply in this case, due to tolling. Another principle which might defeat the criminal defendant's defense in this matter is the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, MCL 600.5855. Under the civil law, if the person whom caused the harm actively and affirmatively concealed the matter from the victim, the dupe may have an additional two years to act, from the time of ultimate discovery. Since there are no appellate level criminal cases citing that statute, however, It is not clear whether that principle applies to criminal prosecutions. What is clear is that silence alone is not sufficient to support a claim of fraudulent concealment, Bradley v Gleason Works. On the other hand, a fiduciary relationship is an exception to that deficiency, Brownell v Garber. Under the common law, the action accrued when the offense was committed and the victim knew or should have known that he had been duped (or harmed, as the case may be). Recently, however, the Michigan Supreme Court in Lansing effectively abolished the second prong of common law accrual (actual or constructive knowledge). Thus, in accordance with the provisions of MCL 600.5827, the action accrues when the offense was committed, plain an simple. Trentadue v Gorton. Let the games begin! Woman Charged With Embezzlement From Law Firm, WZZM13 ABC News, April 23, 2011

Read more detail on Recent Criminal Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Southfield Criminal Defense Lawyer Predicts That Charges Of Embezzlement and Using A Computer To Commit A Crime Will Be Dismissed Due to Expiration Of The Statute Of Limitations rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Southfield Criminal Defense Lawyer Predicts That Charges Of Embezzlement and Using A Computer To Commit A Crime Will Be Dismissed Due to Expiration Of The Statute Of Limitations?

This entry was posted in Criminal Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply