Should Review Doctrine Be Simplified or Restated?
David Zaring, Reasonable Agencies, 96 Va. L. Rev. 2317 (2010). Richard Pierce David Zaring first makes two contributions to the growing empirical literature on judicial review of agency actions and then suggests a dramatic change in doctrine in light of his findings. Based on a study of 226 cases, Zaring found that courts uphold about 70% of agency actions when they apply either the substantial evidence test or the arbitrary and capricious test to agency findings of fact. He then combined his study with over a dozen other empirical studies of judicial review of agency actions to create a meta study of 5081 cases. In his meta study, Zaring found that courts at all levels uphold about 70% of agency actions no matter what doctrine a court applies. Since choice of review doctrine has no apparent effect on the outcome of a case in which a court reviews an agency action, Zaring argued that courts should simplify review doctrine by replacing the six tests courts now apply with a single simple test-a court should uphold any reasonable agency action. Continue reading "Should Review Doctrine Be Simplified or Restated?"
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
- Theory: New approach to judicial review of agency actions from David Zaring From David Zaring (Penn-Wharton), "Reasonable Agencies", 96 VA. L. REV. 135 (2010). Abstract: This article argues that the complex doctrine of judicial review of administrative […]
- Does increased Micropurchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds Solve A Problem? On February 16, 2018, the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) rolled out CAAC Letter No. 2018-02 to Federal agencies which was tantamount to the slight deviation to the Federal […]
- The Dotted Line: 4 reasons why construction companies should let an attorney review contracts, ConstructionDive, ft. Andrew Richards Andrew Richards, Co-Managing Partner at Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP in Long Island, was quoted in an article written by Kim Slowey for Construction DIVE as part of The Dotted Line […]
- Vested rights doctrine Patty Salkin (Albany) reviews a Vermont case talking about the "vested rights doctrine" on her Law of the Land blog in "VT Supreme Court Holds No Vested Rights to Change in […]
- Under DBA, Petitions for Review With Circuit Court Should Be Filed Where District Director is Located The Ninth Circuit previously issued dictum in Pearce v. Dir., Off. of Workers’ Compen. Programs stating that a petition for review of a compensation order arising under the Defense Base […]
- What does “amended and restated” mean? “Amended and restated” is a term that lawyers use a lot. (A Google search produces approximately 792,000 results.) This post discusses that term’s meaning and why lawyers use it. “Amended […]
- The doctrine of primary jurisdiction The New York Public Personnel Law blog reviews a useful teaching case in "The doctrine of primary jurisdiction and the doctrine of the exhaustion of administrative remedies considered […]
- Trump-Mueller Interview: President Should Refuse Request | National Review Since firing the prosecutor would not be obstruction of justice, it is obvious that thinking about but deciding not to fire the prosecutor is nothing close to obstruction of justice. […]
- Texas Physicians Should Review New TMB Rules Texas physicians, PAs may need to register with Texas Prescription Drug Program.
Read more detail on Recent Health Care Law posts -
- IRS Policy Targets U.S. Passports: Congress Should Reverse It | National Review The U.S. government is building the world’s largest debtors’ prison: the United States. Beginning this month, the Internal Revenue Service will begin denying passports to some American […]