Salary History Is Not a Defense to Equal Pay Claims in The Ninth Circuit

Our colleagues Susan Gross Sholinsky, Amy B. Messigian, and Katrina J. Walasik, at Epstein Becker Green, have a post on the Hospitality Employment and Labor blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the retail industry: “Ninth Circuit’s Decision Holds That Salary History Is Not a Defense to Equal Pay Claims.” Following is an excerpt: The federal Equal Pay Act (“EPA”) mandates equal pay for equal work regardless of sex.  Employers that pay men and women different wages for the same work are strictly liable for violations of the EPA unless they can show that one or more of four exceptions apply to explain the wage disparity. The four statutory exceptions are seniority, merit, the quantity or quality of the employee’s work, or “any other factor other than sex.”  The Ninth Circuit recently took up the question of the meaning of the fourth, catchall exception – “any…

Read more detail on Recent Employment Law posts –

Legal notice about the Salary History Is Not a Defense to Equal Pay Claims in The Ninth Circuit rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Salary History Is Not a Defense to Equal Pay Claims in The Ninth Circuit?

This entry was posted in Employment and Labour Law and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply