Russia Investigation: Did Campaign Members Promise an “Official Act” under Federal Anti-Corruption Statutes?

The special counsel’s investigation into Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 presidential election has already brought significant national attention to the Foreign Agents Registration Act and the crime of making false statements to Congress.  Currently, debate is underway about whether the Logan Act, which was enacted in 1799, is too antiquated to be used by the special counsel.  However, the country’s focus could soon turn to more contemporary anti-corruption laws that govern acts of public officials.  Federal anti-corruption statutes could be a viable prosecutorial vehicle for the special counsel given the broad range of conduct anti-corruption statues cover.  Moreover, just last year, the Supreme Court clarified a fundamental principle of anti-corruption legislation:  the definition of an “official act.” Speculation and Statutes Recently, pundits speculated that additional charges might be brought for campaign…

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law posts –

Legal notice about the Russia Investigation: Did Campaign Members Promise an “Official Act” under Federal Anti-Corruption Statutes? rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Russia Investigation: Did Campaign Members Promise an “Official Act” under Federal Anti-Corruption Statutes??

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply