Rebutting a statutory presumption

Rebutting a statutory presumptionHutnik v Kelly, 37 AD3d 346 New York City police officer John Hutnik applied for accident disability retirement benefits pursuant to Section 207-k of the General Municipal Law. Section 207-k creates a rebuttable presumption that Hutnik's "heart-related disability" underlying his application for accidental disability retirement benefits was service-related. In this instance the Appellate Division found that this statutory presumption was "rebutted by credible evidence" that Hutnik did not suffer from a heart-related disability, notwithstanding his personal physician's opinion to the contrary. As there was no other evidence or claim presented by Hutnik as to any other possible cause for the medical condition underlying his claim, the Appellate Division sustained the rejection of his application for accidental disability retirement benefits. The decision is posted on the Internet at:

Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Rebutting a statutory presumption rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Rebutting a statutory presumption?

This entry was posted in Administrative law and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply