Nominative fair use or initial interest confusion?

Interesting ad from the Electronic Payments Coalition (note the referrer mentions "Home Depot campaign," which could be a problem in some circuits, for all Eric Goldman's justified grumbling). Given the colors and the hardware shown, is this "no more than necessary"? Even if so, isn't it obviously legit anyway?

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –

Related news:

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply