New York Times Online Pricing – Like Law Firms?

The New York Times has announced a plan to start charging for online access to its fine content. I had a few day's advance notice via email, as a faithful dead-tree subscriber. I started reading the email, and gave up. One particularly sharp observer, Jean-Louis Gassée, summarizes the Times' pricing policy thusly: – The first 20 articles in a "calendar month" are free. After that, you'll be nudged towards a $15 subscription for 4 weeks of Web access. – Smartphones? An iPhone, Android, or Blackberry app is included with the $15 deal. For one year of 52 (4 * 13) weeks, you'll pay 13 * $15 = $195. Yearly subscriptions aren't offered. But do I have to pay twice if I own both an iPhone and a Moto Droid?There's no Web-only deal. The basic $15 rate bundles Web and smartphone access. – If you have an iPad you'll pay extra: $20 per 4-week billing cycle = $210 for one year. – Other tablets? Not yet. – You want access from all of your devices? PC, smartphone, iPad, Times Reader 2.0, the NY Times app from the Chrome Web Store…that'll be $35 for 4 weeks, $455 for a year. – If you're a paper subscriber, the NYT elders smile upon you: You'll have access to everything from all your devices with no unseemly display of surcharge. But it depends on the deal you make: new subscriber, renewal, special offer, a conversation with a Customer Retention Specialist… It all sounds like dealing with a cell phone carrier or a cable network provider or an airline. Three well-loved businesses. – For e-book readers such as the Kindle and the Nook: Sorry, no access at this time. (Amazon will sell you the NY Times newspaper, but it doesn't give you access to the site.) – What happens if you touch a page through a search engine, through your friend's Facebook wall or Twitter tweet, through a link on someone's blog? Free…unless it's not. Another observer stated yesterday that the Times had spent $40-50 million to study and implement this paywall and some ace hacker figured out a 4 lines-of-code workaround already. It almost sounds like law firm pricing. Depending upon who is charging, what type of work they are doing, whether it is hourly or fixed, incentive or alternative, value or whack-a-mole. Whether the client is big or small, blue-chip or red ink, quick-pay or slow bleed. Whatever. I think law firm pricing is trending two ways: lower and simpler. In fact, for straight hourly stuff, I see 3 pricing levels in the crystal ball. I'll throw them against the virtual wall tomorrow to see what sticks.

Read more detail on Recent Corporate Law Department Posts –

Legal notice about the New York Times Online Pricing – Like Law Firms? rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to New York Times Online Pricing – Like Law Firms??

This entry was posted in Corporate Law and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to New York Times Online Pricing – Like Law Firms?

  1. Stipe says:

    In my experience it is more pticudrove to hire a trained paralegal than a recent graduate from law school. There is also an increase among unemployment among paralegals because of the contraction of the legal profession. A trained paralegal, at a reasonable rate, is worth their weight in gold.The problem with recent law school graduates is that they don’t know anything about the practice of law and this forces the solo practitioner to spend extra time in training, time which they don’t have. More importantly, as soon as the law school graduate finds a full time job they are gone.Our law schools have done a sorry job of training their students in how to actually practice law. They are good at training law students to be supreme court clerks or law professors, but this training is irrelevant to the general practice of solos and small law firms. We have too many law schools, and too many law school graduates who were not very good students to begin with, and will not make very good lawyers when they pass the bar.Give me a good paralegal to work with, and let the law school graduates fend for themselves.

Leave a Reply