New Admiralty Case from Ninth Circuit – Bauer v. MRAG Ams., Inc.

New case from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relating to commercial vessel owner liability for injuries to federal fisheries observers. Not surprisingly, owners are immune from such suits. The case is Bauer v. MRAG Ams., Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22111, and the source opinion can be found here. As a general rule, an observer "that is ill, disabled, injured, or killed from service as an observer on that vessel may not bring a civil action . . . against the vessel owner." Id. 1383a(e)(7)(A). We conclude that this immunity provision precludes a negligence suit by a federal observer who was injured while taking a restroom break. The claimant in this case argued that because her injury occurred during a bathroom break, the immunity provision should not apply. The court found the bathroom break to be incidental to her duties onboard and found the owner immune from suit.

Read more detail on Recent Admiralty Law Posts –

Legal notice about the New Admiralty Case from Ninth Circuit – Bauer v. MRAG Ams., Inc. rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to New Admiralty Case from Ninth Circuit – Bauer v. MRAG Ams., Inc.?

This entry was posted in Admiralty-Maritime Law and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply