Interpretation of sanctions clause in a policy

In reaching a decision regarding the sanctions clause in a policy, the UK High Court made a number of useful comments on how a policy is interpreted: When a dictionary definition is relied on (in this case for the meaning of ‘expose’) it is a useful starting point but is not necessarily determinative of the meaning which the clause as a whole, read in its context, would convey to a reasonable person. One can be ‘exposed’ to a sanction or ‘exposed’ to the risk of being sanctioned so clear wording is needed. Clear words were therefore required to establish a common intention between insurer and insured that the insurer need not pay an otherwise valid claim. In this case the insurer had to show that there was a payment prohibited as a matter of law, not merely a risk that the payment might incur a sanction. Where two experts gave differing evidence regarding the meaning of US laws, it was for the court to decide between the conflicting…

Read more detail on Recent Banking and Finance Law posts –

This entry was posted in Banking and Finance law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply