International economic development – Principal Internet resources
ETTINGER, David. International economic development: Principal Internet resources. College & Research Libraries News, [S.l.], v. 79, n. 3, p. 144, feb. 2018. ISSN 2150-6698. Available at: <https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/16905/18563>. Date accessed: 29 mar. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.3.144. “From attempts to uplift millions of peoples from the throes of abject poverty and starvation to global assistance programs to benefit developing countries’ transition into viable civil societies, international economic development issues dominate the international agenda. A plethora of institutions, public and private, are involved in development efforts, ranging from the U.S. government to transnational actors such as the United Nations Development program. The Yearbook of International Organizations lists more than 100 nongovernmental organizations concerned with the subject. Given the dizzying array of material emanating from…
Read more detail on Recent Legal Marketing posts –
Legal notice about the International economic development – Principal Internet resources
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to International economic development – Principal Internet resources?
- Study Suggests National Divorce Rates Are Tied to Economic Development
- Texas court finds economic development corporations don't receive governmental immunity from suit
- New Developments in International Legal Information Resources
- Presidential Proclamation–Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions
- Openings: Collection Development Librarian & International and Foreign Law Reference Librarian, Geor
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- NTIA’s International Internet Policy Priorities for 2018 and Beyond
- NTIA Requests Comments Regarding International Internet Policy
- Nakagawa: International Harmonization of Economic Regulation
- 2nd CUTS-CIRC International Conference – REVIEWING THE GLOBAL EXPERIENCE ON ECONOMIC REGULATION