INTA press release here. ". . . in concluding that Appellant 'is not using Betty Boop as a trademark, but instead as a functional product' . . . the majority erred by sua sponte reincarnating the outdated and much-critcized aesthetic functionality doctrine . . ." (page 7) ". . . the majority erred in its dictum that, when a copyrighted work falls into the public domain, the owner of a trademark comprised of that work cannot assert trademark rights because that would prevent the work 'from ever entering the public domain,'" (Id.) INTAFleischerAVELA //
Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –Legal notice about the INTA Amicus Brief in BETTY BOOP Case rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to INTA Amicus Brief in BETTY BOOP Case?