Informed Consent Is for Doctors, Not Patients

On Friday, I wrote how I was surprised by the CDC's statement that advance directives are primarily to protect providers from liability. Earlier today while on my way to the park, I was equally surprised to hear Baroness Onora O'Neill say the very same thing about informed consent. In fact, this explains why informed consent is so poor in both the clinical and research contexts. If the objective is to protect providers from liability, then the near-exclusive focus on documentation makes perfect sense. If patient autonomy were really the objective, there would be more emphasis on patient understanding.

Read more detail on Recent Health Care Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Informed Consent Is for Doctors, Not Patients rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Informed Consent Is for Doctors, Not Patients?

This entry was posted in Health Law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply