Including the names of all "necessary parties" in an action is critical
Including the names of all "necessary parties" in an action is critical Matter of Wheeler, CEd Decision 14,581 This ruling by the Commissioner of Education demonstrates the importance of naming all of the necessary parties in a proceeding before the Commissioner. An elementary school principal announced that she was going to retire. Adirondack Central School Superintendent Marjorie Kelly transferred the principal then serving at another elementary school, Forestport, to fill the resulting vacancy. Kelly next appointed Ann Bush, a speech teacher, as principal at Forestport. Bush was simultaneously assigned to be the speech teacher, part-time, at Forestport. Richard Wheeler, President of the Adirondack Central School Administrators' Association, objected to Bush's appointment as a principal with part-time teaching responsibilities rather than as a full-time principal. Wheeler's argument: the district created a new position of "Teaching Principal" at Forestport when it appointed Bush, thereby violating Section 100.2(a) of the Commissioner's regulations [8 NYCRR 100.2(a)].* The Commissioner said he had to dismiss the appeal because Wheeler failed "to join a necessary party" — Ann Bush. The Commissioner pointed out that a party whose rights would be adversely affected if the appeal was sustained must be clearly named as a respondent in the caption of the petition and "served with a copy of the notice of petition and petition, to inform the person that he or she should respond to the petition and enter a defense." Significantly, the Commissioner rejected the Association's contention that Bush was a party to the appeal because she was a member of the Association. Were Wheeler to prevail in his appeal, said the Commissioner, Bush's employment as principal at Forestport would "clearly be affected." Thus Bush is a necessary party to the proceeding and the failure to name her constituted a fatal procedural error. * 4 NYCRR 100.2 "requires a board of education to employ and assign a full-time principal to each school under its supervision" unless the Commissioner approves a "variance."
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
Legal notice about the Including the names of all "necessary parties" in an action is critical
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Including the names of all "necessary parties" in an action is critical?
- CFTC No Action from Including International Swaps for Global Development
- Stress resulting from a lawful personnel action, including discipline, is not a compensable injury within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Law
- NY State Cybersquatting Action Relating to Personal Names
- Critical Implications of the SEC’s Enforcement Action Against Theranos
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- Performance in the tenure area is critical when determining an individual's seniority in such tenure area the purposes of layoff
- The timeliness of the filing of an appointee's Oath of Office critical to his or her continuation in the position
- Undertaking background investigations may be critical in defending "negligent hiring" claim
- Designation of a representative in writing found critical to making a lawful determination
- Right to counsel in a disciplinary action