If you have a plaintiff’s case, don’t wait ten years to serve your lien!

The case is captioned Camelot, Inc. v. Burke Burns & Pinelli, Ltd., 2017 IL App (2d) 170038-U. The Burke firm had handled shareholder litigation for the plaintiffs. That litigation ended in 2004. Ten years after the representation ended, in 2014, it attempted to serve a lien on certain real property owned by the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs sued for declaratory judgment.Plaintiffs obtained summary judgment that the lien was invalid. The Appellate Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment and held that the lien claim was invalid under the Illinois Attorneys Lien Act 77o ILCS 5/1. The court found a number of problems with the lien claim. First, the lien was asserted ten years after the representation ended, in violation of Illinois law. ¶23. Second, the court held that the “Act does not provide a remedy of foreclosure.” ¶24. The court also held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the lawyers’ equitable lien claim. Comment: It took…

Read more detail on Recent Legal Ethics posts –

This entry was posted in Legal Ethics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply