How the Supreme Court's Decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health May Affect Forthcoming "Do Not Track" Legislation

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Sorrell v. IMS Health, Thomas Julin, partner at Hunton & Williams LLP who represented IMS Health in the case, closely studied the Court's decision to assess its implications, including with respect to other forthcoming legislation. In an interview with Marty Abrams, Executive Director of the Centre for Information Policy Leadership, during the Centre's First Friday Call on September 9, 2011, Julin discussed the close parallels between the law invalidated in Sorrell v. IMS Health and proposed federal regulation of behavioral advertising such as the "Do-Not-Track Online Act of 2011," which was introduced by Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) in May 2011. Listen to the full audio recording of Thomas Julin discussing his views on the implications of Sorrell v. IMS. Read Julin's article on this topic published by BNA's Privacy and Security Law Report.

Read more detail on Recent Technology Posts –

Legal notice about the How the Supreme Court's Decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health May Affect Forthcoming "Do Not Track" Legislation rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to How the Supreme Court's Decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health May Affect Forthcoming "Do Not Track" Legislation?

This entry was posted in Technology & Cyberlaw and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply