Google+ again (That's not my name)

Google+ now says it doesn't want even names primarily composed of initials. But it won't even say whether "first name last initial," a standard case, counts. More to the point, it makes a demonstrably untrue statement: "If you use your full name, you'll be able to connect with people you know and help them find you." Given Google's definition of full name, hundreds of people who know me fannishly won't be able to find me, and I won't be able to find them. But, as Catharine MacKinnon has said in a not entirely unrelated context, that's what power is: the ability to make true whatever you say is true, because the way you see the world defines what the world is, regardless of what other people experience. Buzz seemed like an honest mistake. This nonsense, however, is obviously deliberate and has burned off 95% of my Google goodwill, which used to be substantial. Relevant video: That's Not My Name.

Read more detail on Recent Advertising Law Posts –

Legal notice about the Google+ again (That's not my name) rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Google+ again (That's not my name)?

This entry was posted in Advertising Law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply