Georgetown residents file Motion for Rehearing En Banc in their fight against new departure routes from Reagan National Airport that bring aircraft lower and closer to Georgetown creating much more noise and pollution. The residents claim that the three judge panel’s decision on March 27, 2018, conflicts with the Court’s decision in the City of Phoenix case. In the Phoenix case, the D.C. Circuit held that Phoenix had “reasonable grounds” for missing the 60-day window in which to file a petition for review. http://bit.ly/2k2vQgd Appellate courts in the United States sometimes grant rehearing en banc to reconsider a decision of a panel of the court (generally consisting of only three judges) in which the case concerns a matter of exceptional public importance or the panel’s decision appears to conflict with a prior decision of the court. The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure state that a rehearing en banc “is not favored and ordinarily…
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law posts –
Related news:
- 5th Circuit Grants En Banc Rehearing to Address Federal Officer Removal After years of inconsistent rulings, the Fifth Circuit is poised to address a removal issue with significant ramifications for Louisiana tort cases. The previous version of 28 U.S.C. § […]
- D.C. Circuit Says No to Georgetown Residents U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit decides that the Georgetown Neighborhood Associations did not file their Petition for Review within the 60-day limit mandated by 49 U.S.C. 46110. […]
- The Fight Against the Travel Ban The rollout of President Donald J. Trump’s initial travel ban on January 27, 2017 was by all accounts a disaster. Air passengers were told in flight they would not be allowed to enter the […]
- Is it a violation of the automatic stay in a second bankruptcy to file a motion to show cause and to set a hearing date in a divorce case, when the contempt hearing itself follows the dismissal of the bankruptcy case? Is it a violation of the automatic stay in a second bankruptcy to file a motion to show cause and to set a hearing date in a divorce case, when the contempt hearing itself follows the […]
- Ninth Circuit Says Local Rule 90-Day Deadline to File Class Certification Motion Incompatible With Federal Rule 23 In a case with potentially nationwide ramifications, the Ninth Circuit reversed a California district court’s decision striking a motion for class certification as untimely, finding the […]
- St. Regis Mohawk Tribe (and Allergan) File Motion to Preclude PTAB Decision on Sovereign Immunity By Kevin E. Noonan -- The St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan filed a joint motion late last week before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), […]
- Scruggs, other defendants in bribery case file motion to continue trial date
No time to blog on this now but wanted you to be able to see the document for yourself. Click here to view.UPDATE: Some have asked me about a term used in the motion. It […]
- The Futility Exception to the ERISA Requirement that Claimants Must Exhaust Their Administrative Remedies in Order to be Able to File a Lawsuit If you have an ERISA long-term disability claim, you cannot file a lawsuit challenging an insurer’s denial of benefits until you have exhausted your administrative remedies. So, even if […]
- Let Reason Dictate in Restrictions of Commercial Activity by Community Associations Against Residents Many associations’ governing documents include clauses that prohibit commercial business activities from being conducted in a resident’s unit. Some include a blanket stipulation banning […]
- FAA Files Response Brief in SoCal Metroplex Aviation Noise Case Yesterday, May 15, 2018, FAA filed its Response Brief in the Southern California Metroplex matter currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. http://bit.ly/2GrN8Mw […]
