GAO Recommends Reducing Governmental Duplication

A February 2010 joint resolution of Congress reestablishing pay-as-you-go rules on spending bills also required the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to issue periodic reports explaining how to eliminate duplicative government programs. In its March 2011 report, the GAO identified broad government "missions," including defense, health, and agriculture, that are regulated by duplicative programs run by multiple agencies. For instance, multiple areas of the Defense Department oversee development of weapons systems. The GAO recommended consolidating or cutting many of the duplicative programs. The GAO report also found waste in traditional government services. For example, it said that curtailing improper Medicaid payments would save the government $22.5 billion annually. The report recommended making significant changes to government programs, including eliminating farm subsidy payments, reassessing military objectives, and enhancing the tax-collection abilities of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Congress has often ignored GAO recommendations that could require "difficult political votes." However, last year, in response to a GAO recommendation, Congress passed the Improper Payments Elimination Act to increase oversight of payments to government contractors in order to save $50 billion over two years. Perhaps the current Congress will similarly act upon GAO's latest recommendations on reducing duplication, especially since the legislature has called for the GAO study in the first place.

Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –

Legal notice about the GAO Recommends Reducing Governmental Duplication rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to GAO Recommends Reducing Governmental Duplication?

This entry was posted in Administrative law and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply