From the Law of the Land blog of Patty Salkin (Albany), "4th Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Regulatory Takings Allegation Satisfies Ripeness Standard Where Further Administrative Review Would be Futile": In a somewhat complicated fact pattern, Acorn Land, LLC (Acorn)…
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
Legal notice about the Fairness matters
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Fairness matters?
- FCC Repeals the Fairness Doctrine and Other Regulations
- Will Algorithms Take the Fairness Out of Fair Use?
- The Fair Sentencing Act: the Battle Between Following the Rules and Fairness Plays Out in the Third Circuit
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- Discretionary Equity Awards to Directors Subject to “Entire Fairness” Standard of Review
- Seventh Circuit finds that Issuer of Fairness Opinion Did Not Commit Gross Negligence
- Declaratory judgment actions in administrative matters
- Fairness opinions
- The Case for Global Best Practices in Antitrust Procedural Fairness
- The Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Is Now In Effect: What Employers Need To Know
This entry was posted in Administrative law
and tagged Fairness
. Bookmark the permalink