Employer's failure to explain selection decision to rebut eligible's claim of denial promotion negates summary dismissal of employee's petition Baker v Elmira, 271 AD2d 906 What may individual who believes that he or she has been passed-over for appointment to a position in the competitive class for political reasons do in such a situation? James A. Baker, Sr., decided that he would sue the City of Elmira when he was not selected for promotion to fire lieutenant for what he alleged were partisan political reasons. Baker, an Elmira firefighter since 1974, took and passed the promotion test for fire lieutenant. The first four firefighters on the list were promoted before the list expired; Baker was fifth on the list. Prior to the expiration of the list Fire Chief Donald Harrison told the Elmira city manager W. Gregg LaMar that there would soon be additional vacancies as result of retirement. Commenting that Baker was next on the list, he recommended three appointments: Baker, Eugene Ottaviani and Patrick Shaw. All had identical examination and seniority scores. Ottaviani was promoted. Baker sued, submitting affidavits indicating that he was not being promoted because of his political affiliation. Although a State Supreme Court judge summarily dismissed Baker's complaint, the Appellate Division reversed. Quoting from McManus v Grippen, 244 AD2d 632, the court said "it was incumbent upon [the defendant] to come forward with admissible evidence showing that plaintiff ['s] political affiliations and activities did not play a substantial part in its decision." While Elmira made a prima facie showing of the propriety of the promotion, it provided no explanation as to why LaMar chose one eligible over the other candidates, since they were all equally qualified. This, said the court, meant that summarily dismissing the case was improper.
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –
Legal notice about the Employer's failure to explain selection decision to rebut eligible's claim of denial promotion negates summary dismissal of employee's petition
rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Employer's failure to explain selection decision to rebut eligible's claim of denial promotion negates summary dismissal of employee's petition?
- Employee's failure to provide an adequate urine sample attributed to employer's failure to comply federal procedures rather than employee misconduct
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal … as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
- Employer's filing appropriate Workers' Compensation claims forms defeats "statute of limitation" objection to payment employee's claim
- Employee's claim of constructive dismissal as a result of taking FMLA leave dismissed
- Videotape used in disciplinary hearing to rebut employee's testimony
- Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process
- Dismissal recommend after employee is found guilty of off-duty misconduct that violated employer's rules
- Denial of an Article 75 petition to vacate an arbitration award requires that the court confirm the award
- Employer's payment of employer contributions towards an employee's health insurance premiums discontinued during the employee's disciplinary suspension without pay
- Failure to maintain a residence within the employer's geographic jurisdiction deemed disqualifying misconduct for unemployment insurance purposes