Employee did not violate Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by checking Facebook and personal email at work
Lee v. PMSI, Inc., 2011 WL 1742028 (M.D.Fla., May 6, 2011) Former employee sued the company she used to work for alleging pregnancy discrimination. The company countersued under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA") alleging that the former employee violated the CFAA by using her work computer to access Facebook and check her personal email. She moved to dismiss the counterclaim, and the court granted the motion. The court found that the company failed to allege that its computer system was damaged by plaintiff's internet usage, and plaintiff was alleged only to have accessed her own information, not that of the employer.
Read more detail on Recent Copyright Posts –
- Lost sales were not "loss" under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act CustomGuide v. CareerBuilder, LLC, 2011 WL 3809768 (N.D.Ill. August 24, 2011) Plaintiff and defendant had discussed a licensing arrangement whereby defendant would provide certain of […]
- Updates to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Under Consideration When the digital age took hold in America, and an increasing number of businesses began conducting trade online, it became necessary to protect commerce, transactions, and other online […]
- Second Circuit: Computer Fraud Coverage Section Covers Fraudulent Email Funds Transfer In a much anticipated decision, on July 6, 2018 the Second Circuit, applying New York law, affirmed a district court ruling that the computer fraud provisions of a commercial crime […]
- 6th Circ.: Crime Policy’s Computer Fraud Section Covers Email Scheme Losses In the second policyholder-favorable federal appellate court decision on the issue in a matter of days, the Sixth Circuit has held that the Computer Fraud provisions of a commercial crime […]
- Second Circuit Affirms Finding of Computer Fraud Coverage for E-Mail Cyber-Spoofing A New York case that many had anticipated would yield a consequential appellate precedent for cyber-insurance claims has instead ended in a three-page unpublished order finding coverage. […]
- ‘I Don’t Really Want to Work for Facebook.’ So Say Some Computer Science Students. A job at Facebook is plum. But at a recent university hackathon, some young engineers showed a changing attitude toward working at the social network.
Read more detail on Recent […]
- GLB Does Not Prohibit Use Of Unencrypted Personal Financial Information On Home Computer Question: Does the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act prohibit an employee of a financial institution from working with sensitive personal financial information on a laptop computer at home, or […]
- German ‘hate-speech’ law tries to regulate Facebook and others – will it work? Caught in the net(work)In September 2017, a law with the euphonious name ‘Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz’ (‘network enforcement law’) was adopted in Germany. Its goal is to force social […]
- No boundaries for Facebook data: third-party trackers abuse Facebook Login by Steven Englehardt , Gunes Acar, and Arvind Narayanan So far in the No boundaries series, we’ve uncovered how web trackers exfiltrate identifying information from web pages, browser […]
- NLRB Rules on Employee Use of Email What rights do employees have to use their employers email systems for concerted activities? Essential none according to the NLRB in the Boards The Register Guard, 351 NLRB No. 70 (2007) […]