DOJ Approves the Google-ITA Merger but More Antitrust Scrutiny May Be Waiting in the Wings

The Department of Justice recently agreed to a settlement with Google – and agreed not to pursue antitrust charges against the company over its $700 million acquisition of ITA, a travel industry software company. The settlement requires Google to continue developing ITA's software products and license them to travel vendors on reasonable terms, implement an internal firewall to prevent Google from gaining access to commercially sensitive information of travel vendors licensing ITA's products, and refrain from entering agreements with airlines that would deprive travel vendors of flight information. If any competitors in the travel industry file complaints about unfair treatment by Google, they must be reported to the DOJ. ITA's flagship software product is an airfare pricing system called QPX that is used by prominent travel vendors such as CheapTickets, Kayak, and Orbitz. Some of ITA's competitors formed Fairsearch.org to oppose Google's acquisition of ITA. Google insists the merger will "create a new, easier way for users to find better flight information online." DOJ's settlement with Google still must meet with a federal judge's approval. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reportedly may begin a broader antitrust probe into Google's internet-search business. Related RegBlog Post: The Justice Department's "Imminent" Decision on the Google-ITA Merger

Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –

Legal notice about the DOJ Approves the Google-ITA Merger but More Antitrust Scrutiny May Be Waiting in the Wings rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to DOJ Approves the Google-ITA Merger but More Antitrust Scrutiny May Be Waiting in the Wings?

This entry was posted in Administrative law and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply