Determining eligibility for an accidental disability retirement allowanceMatter of McCabe v Hevesi, 38 A.D.3d 1035 Matter of Wise v New York State Comptroller, 38 A.D.3d 1032 Matter of Stack v Board of Trustees of the N. Y. City Fire Dept., Art. I-B pension fund, 38 A.D.3d 562 The McCabe, Wise and Stack decisions consider the question of what constitutes an accident for the purpose of qualifying for accidental disability retirement benefits. The courts have viewed the term "accident" for the purpose of qualifying for an accidental disability retirement allowance to mean a "sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" and "the precipitating event must emanate from a risk that is not an inherent element of the applicant's regular employment duties." 1. In the McCabe case, the applicant, a police officer said that he had injured his back when he stumbled in a stairway while searching for a possible intruder. McCabe said that "I started to walk into the basement and caught [my] right foot on short step landing."* However, McCabe also testified that in the performance of his routine duties over the years, he had encountered thousands of stairways, many of which were substandard or defective. In this instance, the court said it found that substantial evidence in the record supports the retirement system's determination that McCabe was injured by his own misstep, and did not suffer an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. 2. Wise worked as a senior court officer and his regular job duties entailed, among other things, escorting criminal defendants in the courtroom and physically restraining unruly individuals. A prisoner suffered "unexpected seizure" while being escorted by Wise, who was injured as a result. The Appellate Division said that neither the "unexpected seizure" nor being injured while restraining a "combative defendant" constitute being injured as the result of an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. 3. In Stack's case, a somewhat different issue was addressed. Stack's application for accidental disability retirement and his application of ordinary disability retirement were both rejected. Although the Appellate Division ruled that medical findings supported the determination of the Medical Board that Stack was not entitled to accidental disability retirement benefits, it found that the Board's determination concerning Stack's parallel application for ordinary disability retirement benefits was not supported by anything in the record. Accordingly, the court remanded the case to the Medical Board for it to reconsider its determination with respect to Stack's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits. For the full text of these decisions, go to: McCabe v Hevesi http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/03/accidental-disability-retirement-what.html Matter of Wise v New York State Comptroller http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/03/injury-involving-risk-that-is-inherent.html Matter of Stack v Board of Trustees of the N. Y. City Fire Dept http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/03/applications-for-disability-retirement.html * In his workers' compensation claim he reported that he "tripped [and] fell on [a] faulty interior stairway."
Read more detail on Recent Administrative Law Posts –Legal notice about the Determining eligibility for an accidental disability retirement allowance rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.
Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Determining eligibility for an accidental disability retirement allowance?