Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives–Freedom Watch v. Google

Apologies if I’m not being appropriately empathetic, but I think lawsuits alleging that Internet giants are biased against conservatives are stupid and counterproductive. They are premised on factually unsupportable assertions of bias, and most of these plaintiffs would enthusiastically cheer such bias so long as it worked against minorities or the libs. Further, there is no viable solution to “fix” bias. “Bias” is intrinsic in every media ecology, so it’s impossible to eradicate. The closest “solution” to a bias problem is a mandatory must-carry rule, but that would allow the trolls to overwhelm the ecosystem, destroying it. The plaintiffs in this case are Freedom Watch and Laura Loomer. Freedom Watch is a “conservative non-profit public interest organization” with accounts on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple. Freedom Watch claims that, due to conservative content suppression, its growth and revenues have…

Read more detail on Recent Intellectual Property Law posts –

Legal notice about the Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives–Freedom Watch v. Google rubric : Hukuki Net Legal News is not responsible for the privacy statements or other content from Web sites outside of the Hukuki.net site. Please refer the progenitor link to check the legal entity of this resource hereinabove.

Do you need High Quality Legal documents or forms related to Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives–Freedom Watch v. Google?

This entry was posted in Intellectual Property and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply